Saturday, April 12, 2014

Copy and Paste: The unintended consequence of convenience

Copy and Paste, also known as cloning, appears to be a seemingly harmless convenience for busy clinicians. According to the America Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), 74 to 90 percent of physicians use the copy/paste feature when recording information in electronic health records (EHRs), and between 20 to 78 percent of physician notes are copied text (AHIMA report.) Clearly, many leverage this convenience that EHR software affords to busy clinicians.  But, is it a safe practice?


Over the past 10 years, I have heard EHR users hail the timesavings gained by using the copy and paste feature.  I have also seen egregious errors of all types introduced into a medical record by this same practice, including, for example, a situation where an original wound assessment was copied forward for every reassessment so that it appeared that the patient’s wound never improved or healed. Another witnessed example of copy/paste gone awry is where a patient’s historical family condition migrated to the patient’s active problem list and a consultant began treating a condition that was not present for this patient. I’m thinking you might also have observed unimaginable errors. My list of examples is long and my experiences have made me personally reluctant to activate the copy and paste feature within an EHR.  I have experienced this conversation many times with clinicians who argue that we should not punish them by withholding this timesaving convenience because of a few bad actors. The truth is, in my experience, these individuals are not bad actors; they are busy and caring professional clinicians that were set up to fail.  For that reason, I feel we, as specialists in the use of health information, need to implement systems that make it hard for the clinician to do the wrong thing and easy to do the right thing. Using copy/paste inappropriately can result – and has resulted – in redundancies and errors that impact safe patient care and, therefore, we need to proceed with caution.

AHIMA has been raising concerns about this practice for years and recently released an advisory notice on March 17, 2014 stating that the use of copy/paste should be permitted only when "strong technology and administrative controls” are in place.  This notice recommends specific steps for the following groups:
  • Industry stakeholders
  • EHR developers
  • Public sector
  • Healthcare provider organizations
In the end, there are no absolutes.  I believe that users of the copy/paste feature should weigh the efficiency and timesaving benefits it provides against the potential for creating inaccurate or misleading documentation that negatively impacts patient care. The following are the AHIMA recommendations for the healthcare provider organization:

  • Develop policies/procedures addressing the proper use of the copy/paste feature to assure compliance with governmental, regulatory, and industry standards.
  •  Address the use of features such as copy/paste in information governance processes.
  •  Provide comprehensive training and education on proper use of copy/paste to all EHR system users.
  • Monitor compliance and enforce policies/procedures regarding use of copy/paste and institute corrective action as necessary.

As informatics nurse specialists, we are ideal candidates to help healthcare provider organizations implement these recommendations.

To review the complete AHIMA advisory notice visit:


No comments:

Post a Comment